uk medix no delivers to more place
UK Medix Plus Forum / General / food labeling
login
join
search

   Reply to this DiscussionReply to Discussion | Start new discussionNew Discussion << previous discussion - ukmedix   ||   next discussion - ukmedix >> 
Posted By Discussion Topic: food labeling

send this discussion to a friend 

JamesL
04-13-2011 @ 11:54 AM                          
reply
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
          
I was browsing around in the web, and I found some interesting information about food labeling that I thought it would be good to shared it with all of you. I’m pretty sure that just like me, a lot more people struggle with food label reading. Apparently, a lot of the information in the food labels is not real. Also a lot of people look for the fat % and ended eating double of the portions.  A lot of people also thinking that they are in taking less calories by buying organic food. I had no idea it would be soo complicated to stay healthy!

WhittleAway
07-26-2011 @ 9:46 PM                          
reply
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
          
But surely they can't lie on labels can they? That would go against the
food standards agency? I think they do their best to mislead people.
Low Fat, definitely doesn't mean Low Calorie for example. But offten
they say what the fat % is in 100g - they should just tell you how much
fat the product that you are holding in your hand has in it. Surely that
would be simpler?
I never believed organic was less calories, its more about the way its
ingredients are grown - without pesticides etc? Do people really
believe that organic products are lower calorie? That's must be
because they are often describes as 'healthy' only because of the lack
of chemicals..
WA

WhittleAway
08-03-2011 @ 4:00 PM                          
reply
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
          
I just read an article today about food labelling, bemoaning serving
sizes as I did above! Food labels are very misleading..

The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a Washington-based
consumer advocacy, recently sent a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration urging for new regulations that would require food
companies to use serving sizes that better reflect the amount of food
consumers are likely to eat.

The organization singled out canned soup, ice cream, coffee creamer
and aerosol non-stick cooking sprays as some of the worst offenders
when it comes to understating the calories, saturated fat and sodium
consumers are likely to consume.

For instance, the group highlights the label on Campbell’s Chunky
Classic Chicken Noodle soup, which says there are 790 milligrams of
sodium in a one-cup serving, which is just less than half of a can. But
in a telephone survey commissioned by the CSPI, nearly two-thirds of
consumers said they would eat the whole can in one sitting, which
would amount to 1,840 milligrams of sodium – more than the
recommended daily amount for adults, which is 1,500 milligrams.

So a can of soup should be considered one serving OR they should give
you the total calories in the package you are holding and if you eat
half, then you subtract half...

Sasha@
08-03-2011 @ 4:42 PM                          
reply
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
          
Yes, it makes me laugh out load reading serving sizes!
Especially on packets of crisps when you know youre going to eat the
whole bag!

I'd like calories per 100g or 100ml for every product (perhaps per 10 for
seasonings). That way I can easily compare any two products and
calculate the calories based on the serving size I choose. You'll never find
a serving size that fits everyone.

      

WhittleAway
08-03-2011 @ 5:25 PM                          
reply
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
          
It's the sneaky manufacturers! They would hardly want it to be easier for a
consumer to see a competitor was providing a healthier product.

Labelling should reflect the entire contents of the package. This would be
easier for consumers to visualize and portion out for themselves. It would
also be easier for comparing two similar size packages, but that's what
some manufactures dont want to happen.

Loopholes to mislead and cheat!

pod17
08-03-2011 @ 7:51 PM                          
reply
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
          
This is especially true with some sport drinks. It loudly claims on the
bottle how many calories "per serving" but if you read the label closely, it
says "Servings Per Container = 2"

Who buys one of these and only drinks half? They promote these drinks as
being healthy but often they are calorie loaded, not good for those who
are exercising purely to lose weight.

try ukmedix online



Try UKMedix....fast and easy online ordering of:  viagra | cialis | levitra | uprima | propecia | reductil | xenical | acomplia | tamiflu

UKmedix Plus Home | Forum Home | UKmedix Home | Impotence Consultation | Weight Loss Consultation | Hair Loss Consultation
Ask the Doctor | News | Contact Us | Medicine Cabinet


Copyright © 2005 - UK Medix Plus
Powered by < CF FORUM > v.2.1

406 ms - no